Skip to main content

Rembrandt & van Hoogstraten: The Art of Illusion

It takes a split second these days to create an image, and how many millions are recorded daily on mobile phones, possibly never to be looked at again? You can see it all happening in the palatial surroundings of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna, definitely one of those tick-off destinations on many travellers' bucket lists, where those in search of instant pictorial satisfaction throng the imposing statue-lined staircase for a selfie or pout for a photo in the café under the spectacular cupola. But we're not in Vienna for a quick fix, we're at the KHM to admire something more enduring in the shape of art produced almost 500 years ago by Rembrandt and his pupil Samuel van Hoogstraten that was intended to mislead your eyes into seeing the real in the unreal. Artistic deception is the story at the centre of  Rembrandt--Hoogstraten: Colour and Illusion , one of the most engrossing and best-staged exhibitions we've seen this year. And, somewhat surprisingly, a show wi...

Subscribe to updates

Eva, Elisabeth, Angelica, Laura and Gwen

It turns out that the free exhibition at the National Gallery in London offering you the chance to Discover Manet & Eva Gonzalès provides you with the opportunity to discover a whole lot more besides; there are portraits and self-portraits going back to the late 18th century in a display that puts women artists and the challenges they faced at the forefront.

Eva Gonzalès was Edouard Manet's only formal pupil, and his fairly monumental portrait of her, nearly 2 metres high, is a rather strange picture at first sight. She's working on an already framed painting; she seems to be sitting, awkwardly posed, rather too far away from the canvas, the floor is carpeted, and she's wearing a most unsuitable snowy white dress; you wouldn't want to get any paint on her clothes or the carpet.
It wasn't an easy painting for Manet to get right; there were apparently numerous sittings and a lot of reworking. You might assume that the elegantly clad young woman dabbing at a picture of flowers in her best dress would be a mere dilettante, but that's not the message Manet intended to those who knew their art, as we discover a bit later on.

Gonzalès was a serious painter; in fact, one of the most prominent of women Impressionists, but she's not really known in this country, where there's just one work in a public collection, The Donkey Ride, which can be seen in this exhibition. Having become Manet's pupil before she was 20, Gonzalès remained friends with him and they continued an artistic dialogue for the rest of her short life. She died in childbirth at the age of 34 in 1873, just days after Manet's own death.

The most impressive of the handful of Gonzalès pictures on show here is A Theatre Box at the Italiens from the Musée d’Orsay.
You're immediately reminded of Pierre-Auguste Renoir's La Loge, painted at much the same time. If anything, Gonzalès's female protagonist looks out at you even more provocatively and assertively than Renoir's heroine, grasping her opera glasses firmly in her hand and wearing a daringly low-cut dress. It was, of course, rejected at the official Salon as being too radical.

So where did Manet get his idea for painting Eva Gonzalès in a flowing white gown? Well, as this exhibition shows, you need look no further than that hugely lauded and highly successful pan-European artist of the 18th century, Angelica Kauffman(n). She's one of a clutch of painters whose work is used to illustrate the broader context of women at the easel. Her depiction of herself in neoclassical dress with drawing materials is displayed near the Manet. 
Kauffman was one of the two women founder members of Britain's Royal Academy and a cultural phenomenon, as we saw in an exhibition in Dusseldorf in early 2020 that never made it to the RA as planned (you know why). Quite a woman to be compared with. 

If you were an in-demand 18th-century painter, you dressed for your self-portrait to suit your status. Check out the ruff, the headdress and the lacy cuffs worn by Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun, in a pose not too dissimilar from the one Manet used (though she seems rather more comfortable at the easel).
And that red sash against the black dress has an echo in the black sash worn by Gonzalès in Manet's painting. These pictures of Le Brun and Kauffman, by the way, are not random choices; versions of both were painted for the collection of self-portraits of artists in the Uffizi in Florence, where they were among the few women represented.

The curators of this show present a number of paintings to illustrate that even the most talented women artists faced huge hurdles. Access to proper training was limited. Drawing from life was regarded as inappropriate, even morally damaging, for women. Rolinda Sharples depicted herself all in white at her easel in 1816 in The Artist and Her Mother. It was her mother, Ellen, who's looking on in the painting, who trained her and who went on to establish the Bristol Academy, offering life classes for women, in 1844, a surprisingly early date.

Because even at the start of the 20th century, a woman painting a nude was considered shocking. Laura Knight -- the first woman artist to achieve RA membership since Kauffman and her contemporary Mary Moser -- was a challenger of such conventions.  
Not only did Knight depict herself painting a nude model, she also showed herself in proper working gear, with a red smock. This is perhaps Knight's most famous picture, but we can't actually recall seeing it in the flesh (no pun intended) before. You can imagine the harrumphing from the art establishment when it was painted in 1913. 

No easel, no palette, no brushes in this self-portrait by Gwen John, made about the turn of the century, though the black cloth draped over her arm may be her artist's smock. 
She looks out at you, proudly, almost fiercely, daring you to deny her right to be on canvas. In illustrious company, too, because John's picture draws on a long line of male self-portraiture, particularly Rembrandt's depiction of himself at the age of 34, which is also in the National Gallery, and which she would have seen as a student. 

Before we go, it's time to get back to Manet and Eva Gonzalès. The art dealer and collector Hugh Lane bought the painting in 1906 as a star attraction for his planned gallery of modern art in Dublin. He hung it in the meantime in his house in London, which was also used as a studio by the fashionable portrait painter William Orpen.

Orpen shows us a gathering of some of the biggest names of the contemporary British and Irish art scene in front of Manet's portrait in Lane's house. They're all men, of course, including Walter Sickert standing in the light grey suit on the far right.
This is, then, Orpen's Homage to Manet, rather than Orpen's homage to Gonzalès, who was by this time seen as a muse rather than an artist in her own right.

Rediscovering, repromoting, repositioning women artists is very much a theme of the moment; add to your knowledge and appreciation with this fine free show at the National Gallery. 

Practicalities

Discover Manet & Eva Gonzalès continues at the National Gallery in London until January 15. It's open daily from 1000 to 1800, with lates on Fridays to 2100; the gallery is closed December 24-26 and January 1. Admission to this show is free of charge; allow 30 minutes or so. The National Gallery is on the north side of Trafalgar Square, just a couple of minutes from Charing Cross or Leicester Square stations on the rail and Underground networks.

Images

Edouard Manet (1832-1883), Eva Gonzalès, 1870, The National Gallery, London in partnership with Hugh Lane Gallery, Dublin. © Photo: The National Gallery, London
Eva Gonzalès (1849-1883), A Theatre Box at the Italiens, about 1874, Musée d’Orsay, Paris. © Photo: RMN-Grand Palais (musée d'Orsay)/Hervé Lewandowski
Angelica Kauffmann (1741-1807), Self-Portrait, 1787, Cobbe Collection, Hatchlands Park, Surrey. © Cobbe Collection; Photo: Alexey Moskvin
Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun (1755-1842), Self-Portrait, 1791, National Trust Collections, Ickworth House, Suffolk. © National Trust Images
Dame Laura Knight (1877-1970), Laura Knight with Model, Ella Louise Naper (‘Self-Portrait’), 1913, National Portrait Gallery, London. © Estate of Dame Laura Knight. All rights reserved 2022/Bridgeman Images
Gwen John (1876-1939), Self-Portrait, about 1900, National Portrait Gallery, London. © National Portrait Gallery, London
Sir William Orpen (1878-1931), Homage to Manet, 1909, Manchester Art Gallery. © Manchester Art Gallery/Bridgeman Images

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Opening and Closing in October

There's been a spate of exhibitions over the past few years aimed at redressing centuries of neglect of the work of women artists, and the Italian Baroque painter  Artemisia Gentileschi is the latest to come into focus, at the National Gallery in London, starting on October 3. Most of the works have never been seen in Britain before, and they cover a lengthy career that features strong female figures in Biblical and classical scenes, as well as self-portraits. Until January 24.  Also starting at the National on October 7 is a free exhibition that looks at Sin , as depicted by artists from Diego Velázquez and William Hogarth through to Tracey Emin, blurring the boundaries between the religious and the secular. This one runs until January 3.   Tate Britain shows this winter how JMW Turner embraced the rapid industrial and technological advances at the start of the 19th century and recorded them in his work. Turner's Modern World , starting on October 28, will inclu...

The Thrill of Pleasure: Bridget Riley

Prepare yourself for some sensory overload. Curves, stripes, zig-zags, wavy lines, dots, in black and white or colour. Look at many of the paintings of Bridget Riley and you're unable to escape the eerie sensation that the picture in front of you is in motion, has its own inner three-dimensional life, is not just inert paint on flat canvas, panel or plaster. It's by no means unusual to see selections of Riley's paintings on display, but a blockbuster exhibition at the Scottish National Gallery in Edinburgh brings together 70 years of her pictures in a dazzling extravaganza of abstraction, including a recreation of her only actual 3D work, which you walk into for a perspectival sensurround experience. It's "that thrill of pleasure which sight itself reveals," as Riley once said. It's a really terrific show, and the thrill of pleasure in the Scottish capital was enhanced by the unexpected lack of visitors on the day we went to see it, with huge empty sp...

Angelica Kauffman: Breaking Through the 18th-Century Glass Ceiling

In the late 18th century, Angelica Kauffman was famous throughout Europe, one of the leading international painters of the day. A success in London, Venice and Rome, she attracted commissions from Catherine the Great, the Emperor of Austria and the Pope. She was a close friend of Goethe, a founding member of Britain's Royal Academy. When she died in 1807, her lavish funeral in Rome drew enormous crowds. A far from ordinary life, then. And for an 18th-century woman in the male-dominated world of art, an utterly extraordinary one. She achieved equal pay, got women wearing trousers, drew male nudes and even had a pre-nup. It's a story that's arrestingly told in  Angelica Kauffman: Artist, Superwoman, Influencer , a fine exhibition now on at the Kunstpalast in Dusseldorf that will be heading to London, and naturally the  Royal Academy , this summer. Kauffman was born in Chur in eastern Switzerland in 1741 and was a child prodigy, not just as a painter but also as a singer...