Skip to main content

Opening and Closing in December

The 17th- and 18th-century Palace of Versailles wasn't just wealth, pomp and opulence; it was also a place where France's kings encouraged and promoted scientific research and innovation. The story will be revealed in Versailles: Science & Splendour at the Science Museum in London from December 12 to April 21, featuring historic objects and art from Versailles and other French collections.  A new free display at the National Gallery focuses on a painting that's going back on show after 10 years of conservation. Parmigianino: The Vision of Saint Jerome  explores a work created by an artist seen by the Pope as another Raphael. December 5 to March 9.  Can you deduce what a pronkstilleven is? It's a Dutch word, and the painting below is the perfect illustration. One of the Golden Age artists who specialised in the genre of sumptuous still lives was Jan Davidsz de Heem; he painted four enormous such scenes that are now being displayed together for the first time ever at...

Subscribe to updates

A Queer Tale of Deception

Truth is often stranger than fiction, isn't it? Head to the newly opened venue of Charleston in Lewes for Dorothy Hepworth and Patricia Preece: An Untold Story, an exhibition that relates a piece of art history that, you have to say, would make a good film. 

And here are the two principal characters: Dorothy, on the left, a talented graduate of the Slade School of Fine Art, and her fellow student, friend, lover, partner and collaborator Patricia, perhaps not quite so talented, but both passionate about art. 
The photograph seems to tell you a lot. Dorothy looks a little bit awkward and ill at ease, slightly frumpy, androgynous even. Patricia appears confident, glamorous, exuberant, perhaps a little.... possessive? But maybe we're getting ahead of ourselves. We need to establish the plot....  

The rather retiring Hepworth and the outgoing, gregarious Preece became inseparable as students, and they planned to set up a studio together after graduation. In 1922, Preece took examples of both their work to show to Roger Fry, the influential critic and promoter of modern art, and a member of the Bloomsbury group. Fry liked one set of paintings -- Hepworth's -- but he mistakenly assumed they were by Preece. Patricia did not correct him.

Back at the studio, Preece told Hepworth what had happened. So a scheme was conceived under which Hepworth would paint pictures that she would sign with Preece's name, for marketing purposes as it were. And this arrangement would continue for decades, Hepworth subordinating her artistic talent to Preece's larger personality, it would seem. To be clear, there's no suggestion of any coercion in this; Hepworth appears to have agreed that this collaboration was the way forward for them as a couple. 

The first Preece/Hepworth painting you see tends to prove the point. The Girl in Blue was bought by no less an artistic big beast than Augustus John
There's a black-and-white photograph of Hepworth sitting in the garden with her hand on this painting; Preece took a photographic record of Hepworth's output, and there are 20 little prints on a wall here showing various pictures. Dorothy often appears rather unsmiling in them, it has to be said. In one photo, the painting is incongruously propped up against one of those galvanised-steel garden-waste incinerators. 

Fry advised the couple to go to Paris, to study the latest trends in art, and they stayed there for four years. "Modern painting extraordinary," Hepworth wrote to her mother. And for a lesbian couple, the French capital offered a rather more easy-going way of life and atmosphere than stuffy old Britain. Even though Britain wasn't short of artists with unconventional lifestyles themselves....

Now, we can't tell whether Preece was any good as an artist or not; only one drawing by her is known to survive; from her time at the Slade, it's in this show, but it's not much to go on. What was her role in all this, apart from representing the couple to the outside world? She arranged sitters, it seems, helped with the choice of motifs for the still lifes (a lot of Cezanne influence at work), dealt with the outside world in general. The paintings displayed in this show are attributed to the couple together, though usually with a separate line on the caption reading "Painted by Dorothy Hepworth".
Others in the Bloomsbury circle offered support, including Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell. Woolf proposed that Preece should paint a portrait of the trailblazing composer Ethel Smyth, but the conspirators had to turn down such a promising commission; Hepworth couldn't be seen to paint in public or the truth would come out. Once they'd started on their deception, they had to continue with it. Oh, what a tangled web we weave....

By the late 1930s, the artist assumed to be Preece was being celebrated with two large and successful solo exhibitions in London. Duncan Grant wrote the preface to the catalogue in 1936, talking of her "remarkable gifts" and "intensely personal vision". In 1938, Clive Bell wrote that Preece's "pictures are obstinately sincere" and that "for no consideration.... would she tamper with facts as she sees them." Stanley Spencer bought The Green Divan, regarded as the star painting from the 1936 show. 
Let's tangle that web a bit more, shall we?

In 1927, Hepworth and Preece had moved to Cookham in Berkshire, where Spencer lived, buying a thatched cottage, Moor Thatch. But the Wall Street crash of 1929 hit their income badly. Preece began modelling for Spencer soon after they met, and the earnings from that helped pay the mortgage. 

Spencer, already married to Hilda Carline, became besotted with Preece, although we don't really get very deeply into that side of the story in this exhibition. He divorced Hilda in 1937 and married Patricia a week later. There's a photo of the wedding party in this show, and, apart from Stanley's absolutely dreadful hat, what catches the eye is Dorothy standing slightly aside to the left, looking somewhat disgusted by the entire proceedings. But in another twist, Stanley didn't go off to Cornwall for the honeymoon with Patricia, Dorothy did. In fact, Patricia never slept with Stanley at all, and the marriage quickly collapsed, though she refused to divorce him. 

Rather oddly, the curators describe Spencer's pictures of Preece as making her appear "compliant"; that's not the impression we've tended to get. 
The other Spencer painting here is the memorable Patricia at Cockmarsh Hill, with her head seen from the side at the foot of a flower- and bush-strewn hill, a wedding ring already on her finger foreshadowing their marriage. (You don't get to see the nudes: Patricia with pendulous breasts from the Ferens in Hull, Stanley's self-portrait with her from the Fitzwilliam, nor the frightening leg-of-mutton nude in which he crouches over her -- copyright restrictions apply, but you can Google it!)

From 1927 onwards, Hepworth mainly painted interiors and portraits of the residents of Cookham. And that makes it hard to understand how they were able to carry on the deception. Were the good people of the village sworn to secrecy? Surely someone must have blurted out at some point that it wasn't Miss Preece (or the new Mrs Spencer) who did the paintings, it was her friend, the quiet Miss Hepworth. Stanley, by the way, did say he'd never seen Patricia pick up a paintbrush. 
We enjoyed these pictures; they're very understated and rather warm.
We weren't so taken with Hepworth's own nudes, which also seem to have made up a fair part of her output. 

Preece died in 1966, leaving Hepworth on her own. "I try to struggle against my utter loneliness and loss of her," she wrote in her diary. But she continued to paint, still signing the pictures with Preece's name, implausible as it sounds. She only disclosed the secret of the deception in the final weeks of her life in 1978. Without Preece, Hepworth found herself unable to organise models, and the two late works on show here are introspective, rather sad self-portraits. 

What a curious and intriguing story this is, with its glimpses of unexpected ways of acting and thinking and a relationship of which it's difficult to fathom the dynamics. The exhibition has come about after years of research by Denys J. Wilcox, whose monograph The Secret Art of Dorothy Hepworth AKA Patricia Preece has been published to coincide with the show. 

Patricia Preece comes over to us, rightly or wrongly, as somewhat manipulative. Or are we wrong? So many questions we can't see the answers to. This is a show that kept us talking for a long time afterwards about the art brought to life by the duo's story. Well worth going to see. When's the movie out?   

Practicalities

Dorothy Hepworth and Patricia Preece: An Untold Story is on at Charleston in Lewes in East Sussex until September 8. It's open Wednesdays to Sundays, as well as Bank Holiday Mondays, from 1000 to 1700. Full-price tickets cost £12.50 (£14 with Gift Aid) and can be booked online here, though it was fairly empty when we went midweek. Allow yourself 45 minutes or so to see the exhibition. The recently opened gallery is located just a couple of minutes walk from Lewes station, which on a weekday has trains every 30 minutes from London Victoria, taking just over an hour. 

Images

Dorothy Hepworth (1894-1978, left) and Patricia Preece (1894-1966, right), early 1920s. © Dorothy Hepworth Estate
Dorothy Hepworth, Girl in Blue, c. 1928. © Dorothy Hepworth Estate. Image courtesy private collection
Dorothy Hepworth, Still Life with Fruit and Bottles, c. 1927, Private collection
Dorothy Hepworth, The Green Divan, c. 1935. © Dorothy Hepworth Estate. Image: The Court Gallery
Stanley Spencer (1891-1959), Patricia Preece, 1933, Southampton City Art Gallery
Dorothy Hepworth, Interior with Woman Reading, Moor Thatch, c. 1932, Private collection  
Dorothy Hepworth, Old Mrs Barnes, c. 1937, Private collection

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Opening and Closing in October

There's been a spate of exhibitions over the past few years aimed at redressing centuries of neglect of the work of women artists, and the Italian Baroque painter  Artemisia Gentileschi is the latest to come into focus, at the National Gallery in London, starting on October 3. Most of the works have never been seen in Britain before, and they cover a lengthy career that features strong female figures in Biblical and classical scenes, as well as self-portraits. Until January 24.  Also starting at the National on October 7 is a free exhibition that looks at Sin , as depicted by artists from Diego Velázquez and William Hogarth through to Tracey Emin, blurring the boundaries between the religious and the secular. This one runs until January 3.   Tate Britain shows this winter how JMW Turner embraced the rapid industrial and technological advances at the start of the 19th century and recorded them in his work. Turner's Modern World , starting on October 28, will inclu...

The Thrill of Pleasure: Bridget Riley

Prepare yourself for some sensory overload. Curves, stripes, zig-zags, wavy lines, dots, in black and white or colour. Look at many of the paintings of Bridget Riley and you're unable to escape the eerie sensation that the picture in front of you is in motion, has its own inner three-dimensional life, is not just inert paint on flat canvas, panel or plaster. It's by no means unusual to see selections of Riley's paintings on display, but a blockbuster exhibition at the Scottish National Gallery in Edinburgh brings together 70 years of her pictures in a dazzling extravaganza of abstraction, including a recreation of her only actual 3D work, which you walk into for a perspectival sensurround experience. It's "that thrill of pleasure which sight itself reveals," as Riley once said. It's a really terrific show, and the thrill of pleasure in the Scottish capital was enhanced by the unexpected lack of visitors on the day we went to see it, with huge empty sp...

Angelica Kauffman: Breaking Through the 18th-Century Glass Ceiling

In the late 18th century, Angelica Kauffman was famous throughout Europe, one of the leading international painters of the day. A success in London, Venice and Rome, she attracted commissions from Catherine the Great, the Emperor of Austria and the Pope. She was a close friend of Goethe, a founding member of Britain's Royal Academy. When she died in 1807, her lavish funeral in Rome drew enormous crowds. A far from ordinary life, then. And for an 18th-century woman in the male-dominated world of art, an utterly extraordinary one. She achieved equal pay, got women wearing trousers, drew male nudes and even had a pre-nup. It's a story that's arrestingly told in  Angelica Kauffman: Artist, Superwoman, Influencer , a fine exhibition now on at the Kunstpalast in Dusseldorf that will be heading to London, and naturally the  Royal Academy , this summer. Kauffman was born in Chur in eastern Switzerland in 1741 and was a child prodigy, not just as a painter but also as a singer...